Introduction: The Articles of Faith — A Concise Declaration of Latter-day Saint Belief
How thirteen sentences became a foundation of Restoration identity.
Historical Setting and Context
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was still in its childhood when the Articles of Faith were written. In 1830, the Church was organized; by 1842, it had endured expulsions, persecution, martyrdom threats, and the whirlwind of revivalist America. It had also announced new scripture, priesthood authority, and bold claims of continuing revelation. The world naturally wanted to know: What do these people actually believe?
When John Wentworth, editor of the Chicago Democrat, requested a “sketch” of the faith, Joseph Smith responded not only with history but with identity. He closed his reply with thirteen sentences beginning “We believe …” — not speculations, not creedal puzzles, but concise affirmations. These words, first printed in the Times and Seasons (March 1, 1842), became a distillation of Restoration belief. By 1851 they were preserved in the Pearl of Great Price, and by 1880 canonized as scripture.
Their timing is significant: they came at a moment when Latter-day Saint leaders needed both clarity and courage — clarity to outsiders, and courage to hold to their difference in a nation awash with competing creeds and theological noise.
Why the Articles of Faith Were Framed — Purpose and Audience
A missionary manifesto. They were not written for insiders alone. They were framed to be read by outsiders who had no patience for the long theological treatises of Protestantism. In thirteen sentences, Joseph Smith gave the curious a doorway into the gospel of Jesus Christ. That is why missionaries still quote them today: they are designed to prevent distortion by providing a clean, declarative baseline.
A foundation for identity. For members, they functioned as a common anchor. Children could memorize them, parents could teach them, converts could rally around them. In a Church constantly moving westward, often scattered and persecuted, these words provided a portable summary of belief — a creed without becoming “creedal.”
A deliberate distinction. Joseph Smith’s First Vision made it clear that the creeds of Christendom were “an abomination.” That rejection was not of Christianity itself, but of static formulations that sought to bind divine truth in human councils. The Articles of Faith were not a new creed in that sense; they were a declaration of revealed truth that re-centered authority not in councils but in prophets, not in speculation but in revelation.
What the Articles of Faith Are — and Why They Matter
On the surface, they are short sentences. But beneath that surface, they are:
- Doctrinal anchors — touching on God, Christ, repentance, ordinances, scripture, revelation, priesthood, conduct, and destiny. They are the bones upon which the muscle of the Restoration grows.
- Teaching outlines — endlessly expanded by prophets and teachers into sermons, manuals, and lessons.
- Evangelistic tools — clear, simple, declarative. The world deals in summaries; the Articles of Faith were the Restoration’s first true “summary statement.”
- Identity markers — stating plainly: here is where we stand with other Christians (belief in God, Christ, repentance, scripture), and here is where we stand apart (continuing revelation, priesthood authority, modern scripture, Zion).
They matter not because they say everything, but because they say enough to situate us in the landscape of Christianity — while leaving the door wide open for further revelation.
Differences Between the Articles of Faith and Traditional Christian Creeds
A useful contrast:
| Feature | Traditional Creeds | Articles of Faith |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Formulated in councils (Nicaea, Chalcedon) to combat heresy | Authored by Joseph Smith (1842), later canonized in scripture |
| Purpose | Define orthodoxy and exclude heresy | Summarize revealed doctrine; clarify belief to outsiders |
| Style | Technical, metaphysical (essence, substance, Trinity) | Concise, practical, revelatory |
| Scope | Christology, Trinity, salvation | Adds priesthood, continuing revelation, scripture, Zion |
| Flexibility | Treated as fixed, timeless dogma | Always subordinate to continuing revelation |
| Posture | Creeds as sacred consensus | Creeds rejected; revelation preferred |
This is crucial: the Articles look like a creed in form, but they are anti-creedal in function. They do not claim to capture God in philosophy. They declare revealed truths as stepping stones, always pointing forward, never pretending to exhaust.
Philosophical Weight and Insight
The Articles of Faith seem paradoxical: they summarize, yet they refuse finality. They appear creedal, yet reject creedalism. They set identity, yet demand openness. That is in fact their genius.
The Christian creeds were forged in anxiety: attempts to pin down mysteries with metaphysical language. The Articles of Faith were born in restoration: attempts to open up mysteries with revelatory clarity.
Thus, they embody the Latter-day Saint posture toward truth itself: truth is not frozen, but living. Doctrine is not the end of revelation, but its beginning. The Articles of Faith are less a cage of orthodoxy and more a doorway into continuing light. That is why they endure. They are short enough for a child to recite, but deep enough to reveal a philosophy of revelation that reshapes how we think about theology itself. They are not “the final word” — they are an invitation to keep listening.
Additional References
Individual Articles